|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 6 post(s) |
Anthar Thebess
942
   |
Posted - 2015.03.03 16:29:45 -
[1] - Quote
Hole?
I create alliance A , B, C
A : refout starting from 9:00
B : refout starting form 11:00
C : refout starting from 12:00
If something is going bad for alliance B , i move my 3000 people to corp B to defend "final timers" , then move them to corp A , to defend something else.
If not corps, i have alts that move between corporation/ alliances.
We need some grace period.
In order to use this device for alliance you need to be member for at least 2 weeks?
Capital Remote AID Rebalance
Way to solve important nullsec issue. CSM members do your work.
|
Anthar Thebess
942
|
Posted - 2015.03.03 16:31:09 -
[2] - Quote
ISD Rontea wrote:Change SBU BPO to Ensotis link BPO. Is this possible?
BPC only from drifters?
Capital Remote AID Rebalance
Way to solve important nullsec issue. CSM members do your work.
|
Anthar Thebess
943
|
Posted - 2015.03.03 18:04:06 -
[3] - Quote
4h window - ok.
But let alliance setup up to 15 days per month where there is no refout , because of the holidays.
So i and 90% of my members have holidays in period A - don't force us to login because some other group will use this time to harass our space , as their have different believes and for them is normal day.
( need to work also about abusing this system, by moving systems between alt alliances to have 15 days of quiet times , every 16 days)
Capital Remote AID Rebalance
Way to solve important nullsec issue. CSM members do your work.
|
Anthar Thebess
943
|
Posted - 2015.03.03 22:18:07 -
[4] - Quote
So again big guys are getting head start before every thing starts.
CCP can we get something earlier?
Like removing some of the timers?
Let us put eve on fire a bit earlier.
Pretty please 
Look what happen on first changes - give people something that they can use to fight now.
Quote:Alliance:Northern Associates. From:MissMary Thornbush Sent:2015-03-03 21:16:00 http://community.eveonline.com/news/dev-blogs/politics-by-other-means/
So with sov changes comeing N3 will be makeing plans to adjsut how we do things - Now before everyone has a hart attack the patch isnt till June but we have to make adjustments prior too. With this said somethings you need to be prepaird to do. 1. If you are a CAP BUILDER all building needs to stop no lator then march 30th this means finished done nothing more going into build till after we send you a update when this can be done. why- there will be some re adjusting of space and you may or may not be able to build where you currently are and or sov will change to a new alliance as we re orgnize. 2. Some renters will be asked to relocate to new rental alliances as they are formed as we re work how this is done. Atmo you have no need to stress your renter managers for your regions will contact you when and if you are effected how ever the most important part is being ready for adjustments anyone who puts a build in after this mail is fked if we decide your region is being transferd to a new alliance. So do not do it !!! Lady
Capital Remote AID Rebalance
Way to solve important nullsec issue. CSM members do your work.
|
Anthar Thebess
943
|
Posted - 2015.03.04 00:10:32 -
[5] - Quote
Can we get more gate connections between the regions into the NPC space.
Already raised few times :
1. Venal/ Stain to some low sec.
2. Outskirt constellations like : http://evemaps.dotlan.net/map/Paragon_Soul/D9DM-O to some random system in Stain ( while doing similar stuff in all around eve. )
Point number 1 will allow more new comers willing to take some space for them.
Point number 2 will allow them to have access to more space.
I love loosing the need of mindless grind.
All my dreads are happy :) , my wife also, no more 'honey last siege, i know that it is 3 AM'
Don't brake the idea and force pilots to use some advanced ships for those sov capture modules, but mounting them on something smaller than a cruiser should also be prohibited.
Capital Remote AID Rebalance
Way to solve important nullsec issue. CSM members do your work.
|
Anthar Thebess
944
|
Posted - 2015.03.04 00:33:31 -
[6] - Quote
Why not tie indexes to the vulnerability timer?
Higher indexes , shorter timer.
To benefit groups that really use their space.
If in 90% of your systems you have at least level 4 index .... you gain something more in terms of defensive measures.
Capital Remote AID Rebalance
Way to solve important nullsec issue. CSM members do your work.
|
Anthar Thebess
946
|
Posted - 2015.03.04 12:12:25 -
[7] - Quote
Stuff will be epic.
This is how the nullsec should look like from the beginning , constant fight.
I wonder how long it will take for players to find a hole that will allow to overcome this.
Again big groups will prepare for this.
NA will be spited to smaller alliances just to have less systems vulnerable at the same time.
There must be a benefit for owning all structures in a system.
Without of this i make 3 alliances.
TCU holding alliance
Station holding alliance
Ihub Holding alliance
I will setup different timers on each alliance so someone cannot come and ref every thing.
Capital Remote AID Rebalance
Way to solve important nullsec issue. CSM members do your work.
|
Anthar Thebess
947
|
Posted - 2015.03.05 08:05:26 -
[8] - Quote
Kah'Les wrote:
Please just read the dev blog all over again and come back when you understood it.
The whole thing is that right now one guy alone can't go and shot a SBU and promt a whole allaince to reacte to him. With this changes anyone that want to griefe can go out and promt a respons fleet and then just leave without any consequance. Then go and do it again 10 jumps away and rinse and repeat. That you have no understaning of how risk aversing works is pretty anyoing.
There will be no issue in this, as after those changes you need to be few jumps away in order to react.
Vast renter empires? 10 groups 4 man in each and you have 20 systems reinforced each day.
Yes at the beginning it will be harassing those who over reached them self.
Sov in multiple regions?
To many blue that provided F1 numbers?
Some people will be having hard time before they finally let it go.
Then eve will become really fun game.
Some insight into my back yard, yours also.
We want to take back esoteria, to put there again our flag - after those changes we don't want whole, just the part that we can manage 1-2 constellations.
All talks are not about how to evict all those alliances that live in our space , but how to keep them there.
We don't want tons of space , current situation where we can have nice fight after just few jumps is good.
But when you can get the same doing again few jumps into multiple directions - this is perfect.
I start to see ghosts , people that left eve years ago are slowly popping up on forum, TS , they will return when those changes will happen.
Prime time - CCP needs to work on this.
In the current form multi national alliances will slowly start to fall apart, even if they are not big.
Some space will be almost always secured because some people live in totally different TZ than all other alliances in the region.
My suggestion make prime time moment where systems are most vulnerable.
Outside this prime time systems that have indexes lower than total 3 are also vulnerable , but effectiveness of those capture modules is 10 times reduced , additionally it cannot be used on some installations.
So
Index A + Index B + Index C <3
You need to use this capture module to disable some station service or ihub is around 150minutes.
This way people in all Timezones will be having fun.
Capital Remote AID Rebalance
Way to solve important nullsec issue. CSM members do your work.
|
Anthar Thebess
947
|
Posted - 2015.03.05 11:15:47 -
[9] - Quote
Potential holes in this sov capture module :
( using T2 Version of the module ~250km range)
1. I have T2 version , because of the sensor booster i can extend my lock range so i can use this module from 220km. What happens if i shut down one of my sensor boostes? Will module still cycles or shut down instantly.
2. I sit at 249 km from my target, i have max lock range and when something happens i fly away to leave max module range.
What will happen?
3. Someone is contesting station. System is cyno jammed. So i undock in my max tanked carrier and use module on a station.
They have 1 active module i have active module - will this make sov capture process pause or it will just slow down, as my module is working slower because of the ship i am using.
Simple suggestion.
Can phantasm have 1% bonus to module cycle per some cruiser level.
I just love idea where those spiked , mind controlling ships spawn around just to get your space.
So this small vile bonus to fly a ship made by mind controlling race.
"We come for you space and your people" 
Currently :
- angel ships warp faster
- serpentis ships web
- guristas ships have elite drones
- sansha ships have ... spikes
At 40min timer using phantasm will save you 2minutes.
Capital Remote AID Rebalance
Way to solve important nullsec issue. CSM members do your work.
|
Anthar Thebess
947
|
Posted - 2015.03.06 10:59:31 -
[10] - Quote
I think should really think about new SOV <-> NPC space connections, or new NPC stations.
This new mechanic can lead to moving big blocks to NPC space and holding sov in specific region becasue they control NPC space.
Look at those NPC systems :
- http://evemaps.dotlan.net/map/Pure_Blind/38G6-L (SOE space)
- http://evemaps.dotlan.net/map/Pure_Blind/U-7RBK (Mordus Space)
- http://evemaps.dotlan.net/map/Geminate/N-K4Q0 (Society)
- http://evemaps.dotlan.net/map/Fountain/Phoenix (Serpentis)
They are in the middle of the Sov space , they contain usually just few or even one station.
Big blocks can just move all their assets to few stations , and lock potential staging point from people who are willing to contest their space.
Now when you compare this to Delve NPC space :
http://evemaps.dotlan.net/map/Delve/XPJ1-6
http://evemaps.dotlan.net/map/Delve/6-UCYU
You cannot do it so easily as you have station in almost every npc system.
So there will be always place for some group to move in.
Capital Remote AID Rebalance
Way to solve important nullsec issue. CSM members do your work.
|
|
|
Anthar Thebess
948
|
Posted - 2015.03.06 11:57:21 -
[11] - Quote
Can not "contained" sansha incursion drop sov ?
If you did not care to stop the incursion ....
Capital Remote AID Rebalance
Way to solve important nullsec issue. CSM members do your work.
|
Anthar Thebess
948
|
Posted - 2015.03.06 12:06:35 -
[12] - Quote
Lavayar wrote:Looking at the proposed dynamic of structure destruction CCP should think about decreasing volume of iHUB and iHUB upgrades. I suppose it will be cargo capacity of Iteron Mark V.
No.
Look for a WH and then make freighter transport ops.
Capital Remote AID Rebalance
Way to solve important nullsec issue. CSM members do your work.
|
Anthar Thebess
948
|
Posted - 2015.03.06 14:26:33 -
[13] - Quote
S2N forum leak about upcoming sov changes :
http://pastebin.com/3PgbuNtD
Have fun reading.
Capital Remote AID Rebalance
Way to solve important nullsec issue. CSM members do your work.
|
Anthar Thebess
953
|
Posted - 2015.03.08 22:37:47 -
[14] - Quote
CCP is moving into right direction.
What i miss is smaller gate sizes.
Gates that only allow cruiser or smaller ships could be solution for many current nullsec issues.
Downgrading some connections to this size and creating new in this manner could be good starting point for many new groups that someday could contest others in the pursuit for sov space.
Capital Remote AID Rebalance
Way to solve important nullsec issue. CSM members do your work.
|
Anthar Thebess
953
|
Posted - 2015.03.09 08:44:48 -
[15] - Quote
Can we also remove standings?
What you have in your alliance ... is blue , every thing else neut.
Capital Remote AID Rebalance
Way to solve important nullsec issue. CSM members do your work.
|
Anthar Thebess
954
|
Posted - 2015.03.10 07:44:53 -
[16] - Quote
Aiyshimin wrote:The link cycle times should be reversed, and be separated into two different modules with each having proper T2 versions with the usual fitting and cap use drawbacks to balance their advantages. Numbers used for illustrative purposes only and don't represent months of planning and testing.
Entosis Connector I
range 20km, cycle time 5min
Entosis Connector II
range 25km, cycle time 4min
Entosis Link I
range 200km, cycle time 10min
Entosis Link II
range 250km, cycle time 8min
Higher positional risk, shorter exposure. Doesn't this feel more balanced?
No because you are not giving enough time for people to form up , and move to this system.
People needs time - without this it will be just mindless grind , and waiting for a noobspawn.
If you want to fight - you must give people enough time to form up.
What i missing here is again alliance capitol.
So system where you are getting HUUUUGGGGGEEEEEE boost to your defensive abilities.
Each alliance must have this in order for industry to be appealing.
You need to move tons of stuff to station, and then produce something.
Some production takes longer than time needed that you have for reinforce timers.
My suggestion.
Allow each alliance to erect a capitol.
This system cannot be contested until all systems around it are lost.
Freeport mode on this system is extended by 1 additional day.
Alliance can change capitol only once per 3 months (this timer is reset when all sov belonging to alliance is lost).
System designated to Capitol must have max indexes for 3 days( or maybe more)
All systems around it must be controlled by its own alliance.
1 boosted system, will help a lot for nullsec industry guys , and also make more people feel they are home.
Capital Remote AID Rebalance
Way to solve important nullsec issue. CSM members do your work.
|
|
|
| |
|